Pipeline. Retention. Efficiency. Positioning. Marketing is part of the revenue engine, and every AI use case should name the metric it moves. I help you find the ones that move yours, prove it to a CFO, and get to a working workflow without a six-month program.
The pattern I keep finding: a CMO measured on pipeline whose entire buildable list serves competitive positioning instead. Real wins, wrong scoreboard. Or the use cases that would move their number all sit blocked behind one missing system.
You start by ranking what you are measured on: pipeline, retention, efficiency, or positioning. Then fourteen marketing AI use cases, each naming the metric it moves, get recalibrated against your systems, your data quality, who can build, whether the field will adopt, and how fast you need proof.
Your objective does not change the ranking. That stays driven by what you can actually support, which is the only way the result means anything. It changes what the results tell you.
Your team takes the assessment before we meet. I arrive knowing what you are measured on, which of your objectives your buildable list actually serves, where the gaps are, and where your people already disagree. That pre-read is what makes a half day enough.
The format: ninety minutes on diagnosis, a thirty-minute break, then ninety minutes on decisions. The break matters. People change their minds during it.
This is not a presentation. It is a working session where your leaders argue about priorities in front of a framework, and I referee. If sales leadership is in the room, better, because adoption is where most of this dies.
Not a demo and not custom development. A reference implementation of a common marketing AI workflow: the prompts, the logic, the data mappings, and the decision points, packaged so your team or your implementation partner can wire it into your systems.
What you are buying is the six weeks your team would otherwise spend discovering how the workflow should be structured, what breaks, and where the data has to come from. The structure is portable. The connections to your stack are yours to make, which is what step four is for.
Straight answer: blueprints are built for the market, not for your org. The workflow logic transfers. The integration work does not. Anyone who tells you otherwise is selling you custom development at product prices.
I do not build production systems, and I am not going to pretend otherwise to keep an engagement going. When you are ready to implement, I introduce you to a partner who does this properly, with the blueprint and the workshop readout as their brief.
No referral fee, no markup, no revenue share. The introduction is free because the relationship matters more than the margin, and because a partner who is paying me to be recommended is not a recommendation.
I have led product and partner marketing at IBM, Pitney Bowes, Software AG, WealthEngine, and Rocket Software, where I ran global partner GTM reporting to the CMO. My background is engineering, which is why I tend to look upstream at where product, data, and market disconnect rather than downstream at campaign metrics.
Precision GTM is a solo practice. You work with me, not a team you never meet. That is the constraint and the point: the engagements are small, sharp, and priced so you can stop after any step without having bought a program.
Fifteen minutes. You will know whether the AI work you can actually support moves the number you are graded on. If the ranked list is all you needed, take it and go. If it starts an argument on your team, that is exactly what the workshop is for.
If you already know the workshop is the right move, or want to talk through where this fits before running the assessment, tell us and we will be in touch.
Your information is never sold or shared.